RxDoctor Payments Data

Mark Johns, MD

Hematology & Oncology · Cincinnati, OHNPI 1407040884

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

The money is spread across several categories — food and beverage (51.9%), other and education — rather than concentrated in one kind of arrangement. 22 manufacturers reported payments, led by Novartis at 48.2% of the total.

$3,041in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 62 payments — averaging $49.06 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Novartis$1K
  • AstraZeneca$237
  • Pfizer$157
  • Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC$147
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc$124
  • Merck$124
  • plus $785 from 16 others
$996,104in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 1,826 payments — averaging $545.51 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Biontech SE$270K
  • F. Hoffmann-la Roche AG$214K
  • Genentech, Inc.$179K
  • Eisai Inc.$157K
  • E.r. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.$65K
  • Merck$40K
  • plus $71K from 7 others

What the payments were for

  • Food & beverage$1,57952%
  • Education$1836%
  • Other$1,28042%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$3,041 in reported general payments places this provider in the 55th percentile of 450 hematology & oncology providers in Ohio.

See all hematology & oncology providers in Ohio

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$3,125,739
Medicare patients
660
Services billed
145,631

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
CalquenceAcalabrutinib Maleate107$1,597,376
Lenalidomide31$524,030
QinlockRipretinib11$457,839
VerzenioAbemaciclib20$297,791
TasignaNilotinib Hcl12$237,370
IbrancePalbociclib14$220,052
ImbruvicaIbrutinib12$196,346
Everolimus14$141,891
Abiraterone Acetate36$141,718
EliquisApixaban165$126,404
XareltoRivaroxaban18$20,676
Anastrozole613$6,708
Oxycodone Hcl148$5,197
Prochlorperazine Maleate124$3,907
Ondansetron Hcl135$3,445

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
AstraZenecaCalquence$237$1,597,376107 claims
PfizerIbrance, Eliquis$157$346,456179 claims
NovartisTasigna$1,467$237,37012 claims
Pharmacyclics LLC, An Abbvie CompanyImbruvica$30$196,34612 claims
Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLCAbiraterone Acetate$147$141,71836 claims
Johnson & JohnsonXarelto$116$20,67618 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 55th percentile of 450 hematology & oncology providers in Ohio.

Other hematology & oncology in Cincinnati

See the full list for Ohio

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →