RxDoctor Payments Data

Amelia Jernigan, MD

Gynecologic Oncology · Cleveland, OHNPI 1275777682

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by speaking fees: $58,615 of the $84,679 with a category attached, or 69.2%. AstraZeneca accounts for 79.8% of it on its own, with 37 other manufacturers making up the rest. 2025 is the largest year on record at $22,593, more than ten times the $887 reported in 2019. Among gynecologic oncology clinicians in OH with any reported payments, this total sits in the top 10% — high for the specialty, which is a reason to read the composition above rather than the number alone.

$84,679in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 207 payments — averaging $409.08 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • AstraZeneca$68K
  • Merck$12K
  • GSK$620
  • Eisai Inc.$570
  • Meditrina$363
  • Johnson & Johnson$324
  • plus $3K from 32 others
$146,710in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 21 payments — averaging $6986.21 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • AbbVie$120K
  • Immunogen, Inc.$23K
  • Merck$3K

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$10,78813%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$58,61569%
  • Travel & lodging$7,5169%
  • Food & beverage$7,6079%
  • Education$1540%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$84,679 in reported general payments places this provider in the 90th percentile of 62 gynecologic oncology providers in Ohio.

See all gynecologic oncology providers in Ohio

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$30,529
Medicare patients
65
Services billed
172

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
ZejulaNiraparib Tosylate11$202,122
LynparzaOlaparib11$178,471
EliquisApixaban17$9,687
VeozahFezolinetant12$6,751
Cyclophosphamide13$1,204
Ondansetron Hcl31$836
Letrozole19$233
Gabapentin25$170
Olanzapine12$60

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
GSKZejula$620$202,12211 claims
AstraZenecaLynparza$67,554$178,47111 claims
Lilly USA, LLCOlanzapine$17$6012 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 90th percentile of 62 gynecologic oncology providers in Ohio.

Other gynecologic oncology in Cleveland

See the full list for Ohio

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →