RxDoctor Payments Data

Stephen Schuster, MD

Hematology & Oncology · Philadelphia, PANPI 1033147566

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by consulting fees: $168,456 of the $218,110 with a category attached, or 77.2%. It is spread thinly across 26 manufacturers, the largest accounting for just 16.2%. Reporting peaked in 2020 at $49,982 and has fallen 54.6% since, to $22,705 in 2025. Among hematology & oncology clinicians in PA with any reported payments, this total sits in the top 5% — high for the specialty, which is a reason to read the composition above rather than the number alone.

$218,110in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 202 payments — averaging $1079.75 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Novartis$35K
  • AstraZeneca$30K
  • F. Hoffmann-la Roche AG$27K
  • AbbVie$26K
  • Bristol Myers Squibb$18K
  • Incyte Corporation$11K
  • plus $70K from 20 others
$9,266,614in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 285 payments — averaging $32,514 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Genentech, Inc.$2.9M
  • Bristol Myers Squibb$2.4M
  • Novartis$1.8M
  • Acerta Pharma LLC$1.1M
  • Merck$583K
  • AstraZeneca$82K
  • plus $420K from 12 others

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$168,45677%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$7,4393%
  • Travel & lodging$34,54716%
  • Food & beverage$7,6694%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$218,110 in reported general payments places this provider in the 95th percentile of 682 hematology & oncology providers in Pennsylvania.

See all hematology & oncology providers in Pennsylvania

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$57,823
Medicare patients
231
Services billed
996

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
JaypircaPirtobrutinib19$402,160
CalquenceAcalabrutinib Maleate14$204,111
ValacyclovirValacyclovir Hcl18$712
Prednisone21$216

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
AstraZenecaCalquence$30,141$204,11114 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 95th percentile of 682 hematology & oncology providers in Pennsylvania.

Other hematology & oncology in Philadelphia

See the full list for Pennsylvania

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →