RxDoctor Payments Data

Stacy Smith, MD

Ophthalmology · Salt Lake City, UTNPI 1639348899

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

Almost everything reported here is food and beverage — 98.9% of the total across 17 separate payments, which is the pattern of a clinician who attends manufacturer presentations rather than one with a consulting arrangement. 7 manufacturers reported payments, led by AbbVie at 34.5% of the total. That places this record below the midpoint for ophthalmology clinicians in UT, where the typical reported total is $987.

$617in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 17 payments — averaging $36.29 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • AbbVie$213
  • Alcon$134
  • Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.$122
  • Novartis$57
  • Genentech USA, Inc.$56
  • Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc.$18
  • plus $17 from 1 others
$165,351in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 37 payments — averaging $4468.94 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Novartis$64K
  • Shire North American Group Inc$61K
  • Alcon Research LLC$38K
  • Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.$3K

What the payments were for

  • Food & beverage$61099%
  • Education$71%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

CompanyPaymentsTotal
AbbVie(2 entities)7$213
Alcon1$134
Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.1$122
Novartis4$57
Genentech USA, Inc.2$56
Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc.1$18
Akorn Operating Company LLC1$17

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$617 in reported general payments places this provider in the 35th percentile of 191 ophthalmology providers in Utah.

See all ophthalmology providers in Utah

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$562,295
Medicare patients
606
Services billed
5,626

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
RestasisCyclosporine56$62,137
LumiganBimatoprost50$19,983
Cyclosporine21$9,971
Prednisolone Acetate189$5,987
IlevroNepafenac13$4,919
BesivanceBesifloxacin Hcl19$4,292
Travatan ZTravoprost17$4,018
Travoprost19$2,877
Latanoprost199$2,862
Brimonidine Tartrate-TimololBrimonidine Tartrate/Timolol14$2,503
MoxifloxacinMoxifloxacin Hcl105$2,282
Fluorometholone24$1,457
Difluprednate15$1,300
Bromfenac Sodium12$1,205
Gatifloxacin24$1,113

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
AbbVieRestasis, Lumigan$213$82,120106 claims
NovartisIlevro, Travatan Z$57$8,93730 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 35th percentile of 191 ophthalmology providers in Utah.

Other ophthalmology in Salt Lake City

See the full list for Utah

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →