RxDoctor Payments Data

Ryan Hankins, MD

Urology · Washington, DCNPI 1164712469

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

The money is spread across several categories — consulting fees (47.5%), speaking fees and food and beverage — rather than concentrated in one kind of arrangement. Boston Scientific accounts for 81.9% of it on its own, with 27 other manufacturers making up the rest. Among urology clinicians in DC with any reported payments, this total sits in the top 10% — high for the specialty, which is a reason to read the composition above rather than the number alone.

$28,508in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 140 payments — averaging $203.63 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Boston Scientific$23K
  • Angiodynamics, Inc.$2K
  • Neotract Inc.$737
  • Urogen Pharma, Inc.$298
  • Procept Biorobotics Corporation$274
  • Abbott$255
  • plus $2K from 22 others

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$13,55048%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$6,50523%
  • Travel & lodging$3,59013%
  • Food & beverage$4,86117%
  • Education$10%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$28,508 in reported general payments places this provider in the 90th percentile of 47 urology providers in District of Columbia.

See all urology providers in District of Columbia

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$735,553
Medicare patients
924
Services billed
4,024

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
MyrbetriqMirabegron221$252,739
ThiolaTiopronin11$77,620
GemtesaVibegron39$38,494
Trospium Chloride ErTrospium Chloride76$22,799
Potassium Citrate ErPotassium Citrate98$12,793
Mirabegron ErMirabegron15$11,744
Tamsulosin Hcl574$11,228
Testosterone30$9,002
Solifenacin Succinate91$6,084
Finasteride259$5,190
Alfuzosin Hcl ErAlfuzosin Hcl161$4,593
Tolterodine Tartrate ErTolterodine Tartrate23$3,564
Trospium Chloride36$2,821
Estradiol15$2,095
Methenamine Hippurate23$1,807

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
Astellas Pharma US IncMyrbetriq$41$252,739221 claims
Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc.Gemtesa$191$38,49439 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 90th percentile of 47 urology providers in District of Columbia.

Other urology in Washington

See the full list for District of Columbia

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →