RxDoctor Payments Data

Rupa Subramanian, MD

Hematology & Oncology · Vista, CANPI 1376547174

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

The money is spread across several categories — grants (42.3%), consulting fees and speaking fees — rather than concentrated in one kind of arrangement. 7 manufacturers reported payments, led by AstraZeneca at 44.9% of the total. 2024 is the largest year on record at $550, more than ten times the $12 reported in 2019. That places this record below the midpoint for hematology & oncology clinicians in CA, where the typical reported total is $3,371.

$827in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 8 payments — averaging $103.43 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • AstraZeneca$372
  • Sobi, Inc$200
  • Daiichi Sankyo Inc.$200
  • Pharmacyclics LLC, An Abbvie Company$17
  • Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc.$15
  • Pfizer$12
  • plus $12 from 1 others

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$20024%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$20024%
  • Grants$35042%
  • Food & beverage$546%
  • Education$243%

General payments by program year

19
21
22
23
24

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$827 in reported general payments places this provider in the 30th percentile of 1,363 hematology & oncology providers in California.

See all hematology & oncology providers in California →

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$910,687
Medicare patients
387
Services billed
27,029

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
VerzenioAbemaciclib149$2,133,691
EliquisApixaban35$19,874
Anastrozole427$8,149
Exemestane36$6,535
Letrozole138$2,305
ValacyclovirValacyclovir Hcl14$256
Prochlorperazine Maleate16$223
Ondansetron Hcl11$52

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
PfizerEliquis$12$19,87435 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 30th percentile of 1,363 hematology & oncology providers in California.

Other hematology & oncology in Vista

See the full list for California →

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →