RxDoctor Payments Data

Ramez Eskander, MD

Gynecologic Oncology · Encinitas, CANPI 1144486929

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

The money is spread across several categories — consulting fees (53.8%), speaking fees and travel and lodging — rather than concentrated in one kind of arrangement. 34 manufacturers reported payments, led by Merck at 28.6% of the total. Among gynecologic oncology clinicians in CA with any reported payments, this total sits in the top 5% — high for the specialty, which is a reason to read the composition above rather than the number alone.

$706,485in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 526 payments — averaging $1343.13 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Merck$202K
  • AstraZeneca$154K
  • Eisai Inc.$73K
  • GSK$56K
  • Astrazeneca UK Limited$29K
  • Clovis Oncology, Inc.$24K
  • plus $169K from 28 others
$7,460,305in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 74 payments — averaging $100,815 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Merck$6.2M
  • Clovis Oncology, Inc.$369K
  • Eli Lilly$232K
  • Astrazeneca UK Limited$193K
  • Novocure Inc.$125K
  • F. Hoffmann-la Roche AG$110K
  • plus $266K from 8 others

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$379,75754%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$232,43933%
  • Travel & lodging$79,12211%
  • Food & beverage$12,9462%
  • Education$2,2220%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$706,485 in reported general payments places this provider in the 95th percentile of 152 gynecologic oncology providers in California.

See all gynecologic oncology providers in California

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$82,789
Medicare patients
126
Services billed
503

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
LynparzaOlaparib27$344,046
EliquisApixaban41$23,206
Megestrol Acetate12$504
Prochlorperazine Maleate34$322
Ondansetron Hcl26$111
Levothyroxine Sodium14$37

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
AstraZenecaLynparza$153,624$344,04627 claims
PfizerEliquis$2,006$23,20641 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 95th percentile of 152 gynecologic oncology providers in California.

Other gynecologic oncology in Encinitas

See the full list for California

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →