RxDoctor Payments Data

Matthew Dallos, MD

Hematology & Oncology · New York, NYNPI 1578825071

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by consulting fees: $14,003 of the $20,320 with a category attached, or 68.9%. 8 manufacturers reported payments, led by Bayer at 46.2% of the total. Reporting peaked in 2019 at $8,170 and has fallen 89.0% since, to $902 in 2025.

$20,320in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 48 payments — averaging $423.32 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Bayer$9K
  • E.r. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.$7K
  • Sanofi$2K
  • Clovis Oncology, Inc.$1K
  • AstraZeneca$366
  • Pfizer$149
  • plus $139 from 2 others
$1,353,060in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 21 payments — averaging $64,431 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Janssen Research & Development, LLC$755K
  • E.r. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.$509K
  • Genentech, Inc.$48K
  • Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc.$41K

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$14,00369%
  • Travel & lodging$3,62618%
  • Food & beverage$2,67313%
  • Education$180%

General payments by program year

19
20
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

CompanyPaymentsTotal
Bayer15$9,385
E.r. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.21$6,586
Sanofi3$2,455
Clovis Oncology, Inc.1$1,240
AstraZeneca5$366
Pfizer1$149
Johnson & Johnson1$121
Merck1$18

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$20,320 in reported general payments places this provider in the 80th percentile of 967 hematology & oncology providers in New York.

See all hematology & oncology providers in New York →

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$47,041
Medicare patients
146
Services billed
408

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
NubeqaDarolutamide74$988,246
XtandiEnzalutamide72$897,207
ErleadaApalutamide11$159,131
Abiraterone Acetate86$158,179
OrgovyxRelugolix54$142,256
Prednisone130$701
Ondansetron Hcl17$535
Tamsulosin Hcl16$118
Atorvastatin Calcium11$15

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
BayerNubeqa$9,385$988,24674 claims
Johnson & JohnsonErleada$121$159,13111 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 80th percentile of 967 hematology & oncology providers in New York.

Other hematology & oncology in New York

See the full list for New York →

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →