RxDoctor Payments Data

Lindsay Rein, MD

Hematology · Durham, NCNPI 1457526659

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by consulting fees: $63,124 of the $73,497 with a category attached, or 85.9%. 10 manufacturers reported payments, led by Sobi, Inc at 27.3% of the total. 2025 is the largest year on record at $24,922, more than ten times the $1,997 reported in 2019.

$73,497in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 60 payments — averaging $1224.94 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Sobi, Inc$20K
  • Novartis$13K
  • Incyte Corporation$10K
  • AbbVie$8K
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc.$8K
  • Blueprint Medicines Corporation$5K
  • plus $10K from 4 others
$3,648,954in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 1,034 payments — averaging $3528.97 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Incyte Corporation$1.5M
  • Novartis$795K
  • Pharmaessentia USA Corporation$438K
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc.$408K
  • Blueprint Medicines Corporation$290K
  • Bristol Myers Squibb$82K
  • plus $123K from 4 others

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$63,12486%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$6,6989%
  • Travel & lodging$2,1483%
  • Food & beverage$1,4262%
  • Education$1000%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$73,497 in reported general payments places this provider in the 75th percentile of 65 hematology providers in North Carolina.

See all hematology providers in North Carolina

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$29,383
Medicare patients
72
Services billed
341

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
JakafiRuxolitinib Phosphate112$1,583,810
OjjaaraMomelotinib Dihydrochloride36$914,161
InrebicFedratinib Dihydrochloride16$260,749
ScemblixAsciminib Hydrochloride12$179,156
BosulifBosutinib27$175,879
Imatinib Mesylate48$50,579
Hydroxyurea77$1,944
Acyclovir41$233

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
Incyte CorporationJakafi$9,610$1,583,810112 claims
NovartisScemblix$13,394$179,15612 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 75th percentile of 65 hematology providers in North Carolina.

Other hematology in Durham

See the full list for North Carolina

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →