RxDoctor Payments Data

Katrina Fischer

Hematology & Oncology · San Mateo, CANPI 1477972388

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by other: $2,315 of the $2,988 with a category attached, or 77.5%. Novartis accounts for 77.5% of it on its own, with 11 other manufacturers making up the rest. 2025 is the largest year on record at $1,130, 9.4 times the $121 reported in 2019. That places this record below the midpoint for hematology & oncology clinicians in CA, where the typical reported total is $3,371.

$2,988in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 44 payments — averaging $67.90 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Novartis$2K
  • GSK$182
  • Genentech USA, Inc.$121
  • E.r. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.$98
  • AstraZeneca$68
  • Novocure Inc.$48
  • plus $155 from 6 others

What the payments were for

  • Food & beverage$57219%
  • Education$1003%
  • Other$2,31578%

General payments by program year

19
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$2,988 in reported general payments places this provider in the 45th percentile of 1,363 hematology & oncology providers in California.

See all hematology & oncology providers in California →

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$3,130,641
Medicare patients
929
Services billed
193,801

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
XareltoRivaroxaban19$31,128
EliquisApixaban12$8,204
Letrozole50$1,580
Imatinib Mesylate12$884
Hydroxyurea27$835
Dexamethasone21$270
Prochlorperazine Maleate18$205

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
PfizerEliquis$32$8,20412 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 45th percentile of 1,363 hematology & oncology providers in California.

Other hematology & oncology in San Mateo

See the full list for California →

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →