RxDoctor Payments Data

Jordyn Hofer

Family · Sioux Falls, SDNPI 1114698875

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

Almost everything reported here is food and beverage — 100.0% of the total across 230 separate payments, which is the pattern of a clinician who attends manufacturer presentations rather than one with a consulting arrangement. It is spread thinly across 33 manufacturers, the largest accounting for just 17.1% — the pattern of someone who eats at a lot of different presentations. Among family clinicians in SD with any reported payments, this total sits in the top 5% — high for the specialty, which is a reason to read the composition above rather than the number alone.

$3,455in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 230 payments — averaging $15.02 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • AbbVie$590
  • Novo Nordisk$491
  • Pfizer$367
  • Lilly USA, LLC$315
  • Amgen$202
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc$149
  • plus $1K from 27 others

What the payments were for

  • Food & beverage$3,455100%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

How this compares

$3,455 in reported general payments places this provider in the 95th percentile of 588 family providers in South Dakota.

See all family providers in South Dakota

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$5,602
Medicare patients
77
Services billed
105

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
OzempicSemaglutide20$27,502
TrulicityDulaglutide15$20,285
MounjaroTirzepatide16$18,615
XareltoRivaroxaban14$17,172
Trelegy ElliptaFluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter17$13,210
GlyxambiEmpagliflozin/Linagliptin21$11,966
FarxigaDapagliflozin Propanediol14$10,916
Basaglar Kwikpen U-100Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog12$3,807
Rosuvastatin Calcium93$2,239
Tizanidine Hcl14$1,858
Ventolin HfaAlbuterol Sulfate15$1,442
Metoprolol Succinate63$1,145
Atorvastatin Calcium124$1,127
Omeprazole129$1,089
Gabapentin58$952

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
Lilly USA, LLCTrulicity, Mounjaro$315$38,89931 claims
Novo NordiskOzempic$491$27,50220 claims
Johnson & JohnsonXarelto$67$17,17214 claims
GSKTrelegy Ellipta$116$13,21017 claims
Boehringer IngelheimGlyxambi$59$11,96621 claims
AstraZenecaFarxiga$74$10,91614 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 95th percentile of 588 family providers in South Dakota.

Other family in Sioux Falls

See the full list for South Dakota

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →