RxDoctor Payments Data

Jeremy Cook, MD

Dermatology · Woodbury, MNNPI 1982865317

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

Almost everything reported here is food and beverage — 100.0% of the total across 81 separate payments, which is the pattern of a clinician who attends manufacturer presentations rather than one with a consulting arrangement. It is spread thinly across 30 manufacturers, the largest accounting for just 11.7% — the pattern of someone who eats at a lot of different presentations.

$1,332in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 81 payments — averaging $16.44 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • UCB, Inc.$155
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc.$127
  • Incyte Corporation$105
  • Johnson & Johnson$76
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc.$70
  • Lilly USA, LLC$67
  • plus $731 from 24 others

What the payments were for

  • Food & beverage$1,332100%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

19
20
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

How this compares

$1,332 in reported general payments places this provider in the 80th percentile of 273 dermatology providers in Minnesota.

See all dermatology providers in Minnesota

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$380,827
Medicare patients
862
Services billed
5,042

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
Cosentyx Unoready PenSecukinumab12$86,968
Dupixent SyringeDupilumab12$46,413
Dupixent PenDupilumab12$45,166
EucrisaCrisaborole14$10,180
Ketoconazole233$5,984
Betamethasone Dipropionate124$4,661
Ivermectin13$4,061
Fluticasone Propionate134$2,397
Metronidazole57$2,328
Triamcinolone Acetonide219$2,323
Betamethasone Diprop AugmentedBetamethasone/Propylene Glyc99$2,311
Clobetasol Propionate77$2,101
Azelaic Acid14$2,077
Calcipotriene17$1,942
Tacrolimus14$1,866

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
PfizerEucrisa$65$10,18014 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 80th percentile of 273 dermatology providers in Minnesota.

Other dermatology in Woodbury

See the full list for Minnesota

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →