RxDoctor Payments Data

David Pearson, MD

Dermatology · Minneapolis, MNNPI 1679916589

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by consulting fees: $45,457 of the $45,541 with a category attached, or 99.8%. Merck accounts for 67.0% of it on its own, with 3 other manufacturers making up the rest. 2025 is the largest year on record at $29,513, more than ten times the $85 reported in 2019. Among dermatology clinicians in MN with any reported payments, this total sits in the top 5% — high for the specialty, which is a reason to read the composition above rather than the number alone.

$45,541in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 26 payments — averaging $1751.59 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Merck$31K
  • Pfizer$13K
  • Astrazeneca UK Limited$2K
  • Intuitive Surgical$85
$134,299in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 21 payments — averaging $6395.18 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Daiichi Sankyo Company LTD$67K
  • Pfizer$56K
  • EMD Serono, Inc.$6K
  • Biogen$5K

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$45,457100%
  • Food & beverage$850%

General payments by program year

19
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

CompanyPaymentsTotal
Merck15$30,515
Pfizer9$12,796
Astrazeneca UK Limited1$2,145
Intuitive Surgical1$85

How this compares

$45,541 in reported general payments places this provider in the 95th percentile of 273 dermatology providers in Minnesota.

See all dermatology providers in Minnesota

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$71,653
Medicare patients
292
Services billed
1,319

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
Humira(Cf) PenAdalimumab35$465,940
Dupixent PenDupilumab102$416,955
Skyrizi PenRisankizumab-Rzaa13$262,868
OtezlaApremilast40$235,349
HizentraImmun Glob G(Igg)/Pro/Iga 0-5022$192,839
RemicadeInfliximab11$108,790
Dupixent SyringeDupilumab23$100,830
CibinqoAbrocitinib11$61,345
Mycophenolic AcidMycophenolate Sodium18$10,334
Betamethasone Diprop AugmentedBetamethasone/Propylene Glyc146$8,360
Cyclosporine15$6,957
Mycophenolate Mofetil59$4,370
Dapsone24$4,273
Doxycycline Monohydrate71$3,420
Clobetasol Propionate58$3,260

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
PfizerCibinqo$12,796$61,34511 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 95th percentile of 273 dermatology providers in Minnesota.

Other dermatology in Minneapolis

See the full list for Minnesota

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →