RxDoctor Payments Data

Jennifer Maender, MD

Dermatology · Sugar Land, TXNPI 1962524371

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by speaking fees: $93,850 of the $127,265 with a category attached, or 73.7%. Lilly USA, LLC accounts for 83.0% of it on its own, with 36 other manufacturers making up the rest. 2025 is the largest year on record at $65,883, more than ten times the $3,435 reported in 2019. Among dermatology clinicians in TX with any reported payments, this total sits in the top 10% — high for the specialty, which is a reason to read the composition above rather than the number alone.

$127,265in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 1,185 payments — averaging $107.40 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Lilly USA, LLC$106K
  • AbbVie$5K
  • Johnson & Johnson$3K
  • Novartis$2K
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc.$2K
  • Incyte Corporation$1K
  • plus $9K from 31 others

What the payments were for

  • Speaking & faculty fees$93,85074%
  • Travel & lodging$7,6566%
  • Food & beverage$25,15020%
  • Education$6080%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$127,265 in reported general payments places this provider in the 90th percentile of 1,098 dermatology providers in Texas.

See all dermatology providers in Texas →

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$391,597
Medicare patients
810
Services billed
5,842

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
Dupixent PenDupilumab33$130,393
OtezlaApremilast11$52,588
Tacrolimus22$2,906
Halobetasol Propionate57$2,371
Ketoconazole176$2,329
Triamcinolone Acetonide221$2,230
Fluocinonide68$2,214
Doxycycline Monohydrate113$2,210
Tretinoin21$1,665
Metronidazole41$1,488
Fluorouracil15$1,319
Fluocinolone AcetonideFluocinolone/Shower Cap25$1,211
Calcipotriene12$1,082
Betamethasone Dipropionate18$957
Clobetasol Propionate33$937

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
AmgenOtezla$766$52,58811 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 90th percentile of 1,098 dermatology providers in Texas.

Other dermatology in Sugar Land

See the full list for Texas →

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →