RxDoctor Payments Data

Joseph Merola

Dermatology · Dallas, TXNPI 1881807469

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by consulting fees: $940,780 of the $1,162,527 with a category attached, or 80.9%. It is spread thinly across 36 manufacturers, the largest accounting for just 16.0%. Among dermatology clinicians in TX with any reported payments, this total sits in the top 5% — high for the specialty, which is a reason to read the composition above rather than the number alone.

$1,162,527in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 1,111 payments — averaging $1046.38 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • E.r. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.$186K
  • Novartis$125K
  • Sanofi$107K
  • Eli Lilly$96K
  • AbbVie$89K
  • UCB SA$68K
  • plus $490K from 30 others
$1,190,300in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 280 payments — averaging $4251.07 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Eli Lilly$195K
  • Amgen$179K
  • Regeneron$152K
  • Novartis$107K
  • Pfizer$100K
  • UCB SA$92K
  • plus $367K from 12 others

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$940,78081%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$110,0589%
  • Travel & lodging$80,1947%
  • Food & beverage$18,0132%
  • Education$13,4821%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$1,162,527 in reported general payments places this provider in the 95th percentile of 1,098 dermatology providers in Texas.

See all dermatology providers in Texas

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$21,742
Medicare patients
93
Services billed
247

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
Taltz AutoinjectorIxekizumab25$178,433
Bimzelx AutoinjectorBimekizumab-Bkzx11$161,141
OtezlaApremilast20$96,864
Dupixent PenDupilumab20$68,881
Clobetasol Propionate38$1,595
ValacyclovirValacyclovir Hcl22$347
Triamcinolone Acetonide16$296
Ketoconazole21$270
Minoxidil17$138

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
AmgenOtezla$67,121$96,86420 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 95th percentile of 1,098 dermatology providers in Texas.

Other dermatology in Dallas

See the full list for Texas

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →