RxDoctor Payments Data

Eileen Chang, MD

Glaucoma Specialist · New York, NYNPI 1831543347

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

Almost everything reported here is food and beverage — 96.2% of the total across 74 separate payments, which is the pattern of a clinician who attends manufacturer presentations rather than one with a consulting arrangement. 12 manufacturers reported payments, led by AbbVie at 25.7% of the total.

$2,666in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 74 payments — averaging $36.03 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • AbbVie$685
  • Glaukos Corporation$557
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc.$334
  • Sight Sciences, Inc.$316
  • Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc.$211
  • ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.$150
  • plus $413 from 6 others

What the payments were for

  • Food & beverage$2,56696%
  • Education$1004%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$2,666 in reported general payments places this provider in the 55th percentile of 35 glaucoma specialist providers in New York.

See all glaucoma specialist providers in New York

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$138,685
Medicare patients
348
Services billed
1,206

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
RocklatanNetarsudil Mesylat/Latanoprost71$37,889
RhopressaNetarsudil Mesylate81$28,154
SimbrinzaBrinzolamide/Brimonidine Tart67$15,880
Brimonidine Tartrate167$15,880
LumiganBimatoprost21$14,202
VyzultaLatanoprostene Bunod27$12,664
RestasisCyclosporine11$12,329
Brinzolamide39$9,881
Travoprost24$7,131
Timolol MaleateTimolol Maleate/Pf18$6,931
Methazolamide13$4,767
Brimonidine Tartrate-TimololBrimonidine Tartrate/Timolol27$4,717
Prednisolone Acetate79$4,018
Dorzolamide-TimololDorzolamide Hcl/Timolol Maleat221$3,488
Latanoprost273$3,405

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
AbbVieLumigan, Restasis$685$26,53132 claims
AlconSimbrinza$114$15,88067 claims
Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc.Vyzulta$334$12,66427 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 55th percentile of 35 glaucoma specialist providers in New York.

Other glaucoma specialist in New York

See the full list for New York

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →