RxDoctor Payments Data

Deepak Rao

Rheumatology · Boston, MANPI 1770803629

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by consulting fees: $52,662 of the $64,159 with a category attached, or 82.1%. It is spread thinly across 9 manufacturers, the largest accounting for just 21.5%. Among rheumatology clinicians in MA with any reported payments, this total sits in the top 10% — high for the specialty, which is a reason to read the composition above rather than the number alone.

$64,159in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 46 payments — averaging $1394.75 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • E.r. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.$14K
  • Merck$9K
  • Janssen Research & Development, LLC$8K
  • Biogen$7K
  • Astrazeneca UK Limited$6K
  • Pfizer$6K
  • plus $14K from 3 others
$1,628,217in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 14 payments — averaging $116,301 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Janssen Research & Development, LLC$1.6M

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$52,66282%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$8,31513%
  • Travel & lodging$2,3634%
  • Food & beverage$8181%

General payments by program year

19
20
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

CompanyPaymentsTotal
E.r. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.20$13,775
Merck9$9,056
Janssen Research & Development, LLC3$7,851
Biogen3$6,867
Astrazeneca UK Limited3$6,444
Pfizer3$6,000
GSK3$5,743
AbbVie1$5,200
Astrazeneca AB1$3,222

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$64,159 in reported general payments places this provider in the 90th percentile of 265 rheumatology providers in Massachusetts.

See all rheumatology providers in Massachusetts

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$10,250
Medicare patients
51
Services billed
97

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
Humira(Cf) PenAdalimumab20$127,036
XeljanzTofacitinib Citrate22$77,597
MethotrexateMethotrexate Sodium34$975
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate27$659
Prednisone59$259
Alendronate Sodium14$146
Allopurinol13$122

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
PfizerXeljanz$6,000$77,59722 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 90th percentile of 265 rheumatology providers in Massachusetts.

Other rheumatology in Boston

See the full list for Massachusetts

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →