RxDoctor Payments Data

Darren McGuire, MD

Cardiovascular Disease · Dallas, TXNPI 1336106715

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by consulting fees: $910,035 of the $1,190,560 with a category attached, or 76.4%. It is spread thinly across 39 manufacturers, the largest accounting for just 14.2%. Reporting peaked in 2019 at $321,302 and has fallen 72.1% since, to $89,727 in 2025. Among cardiovascular disease clinicians in TX with any reported payments, this total sits in the top 5% — high for the specialty, which is a reason to read the composition above rather than the number alone.

$1,190,560in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 532 payments — averaging $2237.89 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Novo Nordisk$169K
  • Novo Nordisk AS$166K
  • Eli Lilly$156K
  • Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH$86K
  • Boehringer Ingelheim$62K
  • Merck$55K
  • plus $497K from 33 others
$369,747in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 112 payments — averaging $3301.32 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Novo Nordisk AS$147K
  • Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH$122K
  • Pfizer$57K
  • Eli Lilly$19K
  • Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.$9K
  • Akebia Therapeutics Inc$6K
  • plus $9K from 3 others

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$910,03576%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$108,2029%
  • Travel & lodging$163,32714%
  • Food & beverage$8,9961%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

CompanyPaymentsTotal
Novo Nordisk66$168,512
Novo Nordisk AS45$165,861
Eli Lilly101$155,650
Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH63$86,015
Boehringer Ingelheim45$61,693
Merck39$55,362
Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc.5$47,402
Sanofi-aventis U.S. LLC18$45,585
Boehringer Ingelheim B.v.5$44,503
Pfizer12$41,340
Boehringer Ingelheim Pty Ltd7$38,557
CSL Behring13$35,600
Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.13$31,950
Astrazeneca UK Limited17$19,032
GSK10$17,069
Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.1$14,000
AstraZeneca9$14,000
Boehringer Ingelheim Mexico SA De CV3$12,000
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.5$11,750
Dynavax Technologies Corporation10$11,750
AbbVie5$11,275
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc.1$10,928
Ipsen Bioscience Inc.1$10,500
Sanofi US Services Inc.2$9,781
Amgen11$9,542
Neovasc Medical Inc1$9,100
Idorsia Pharmaceuticals US Inc2$8,254
Boehringer Ingelheim Singapore Pte. Ltd.2$8,060
Boehringer Ingelheim MENA (scientific Office) Fz-llc3$7,830
Bayer3$7,257
F. Hoffmann-la Roche AG1$6,440
Boehringer Ingelheim (phil.) Inc.1$4,000
Novartis1$3,600
Boehringer Ingelheim India Pvt. Ltd.1$2,320
Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC1$2,000
Janssen Research & Development, LLC1$1,000
Altathera Pharmaceuticals LLC1$600
Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.5$319
Medtronic2$124

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$1,190,560 in reported general payments places this provider in the 95th percentile of 1,515 cardiovascular disease providers in Texas.

See all cardiovascular disease providers in Texas

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$9,363
Medicare patients
68
Services billed
87

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Other cardiovascular disease in Dallas

See the full list for Texas

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →