RxDoctor Payments Data

Amber Patterson, MD

Allergy & Immunology · Findlay, OHNPI 1104082957

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by speaking fees: $94,912 of the $128,268 with a category attached, or 74.0%. 31 manufacturers reported payments, led by GSK at 49.1% of the total. 2025 is the largest year on record at $58,456, 3.8 times the $15,433 reported in 2019. Among allergy & immunology clinicians in OH with any reported payments, this total sits in the top 10% — high for the specialty, which is a reason to read the composition above rather than the number alone.

$128,268in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 386 payments — averaging $332.30 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • GSK$63K
  • ARS Pharmaceuticals Operations, Inc.$40K
  • Shire North American Group Inc$12K
  • Optinose US, Inc.$3K
  • Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.$3K
  • Kaleo, Inc.$2K
  • plus $6K from 25 others
$54,786in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 4 payments — averaging $13,696 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Amgen$25K
  • Astrazeneca UK Limited$18K
  • Sanofi US Services Inc.$12K

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$7,3836%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$94,91274%
  • Travel & lodging$16,42613%
  • Food & beverage$9,3597%
  • Education$1880%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$128,268 in reported general payments places this provider in the 90th percentile of 128 allergy & immunology providers in Ohio.

See all allergy & immunology providers in Ohio

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$54,811
Medicare patients
107
Services billed
4,071

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
NucalaMepolizumab21$84,212
XolairOmalizumab19$44,561
Breo ElliptaFluticasone/Vilanterol12$5,798
Epinephrine13$3,315
Ipratropium Bromide33$1,270
Montelukast Sodium91$1,135
Fluticasone Propionate24$469
Azelastine Hcl16$263

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
GSKNucala, Breo Ellipta$62,942$90,01033 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 90th percentile of 128 allergy & immunology providers in Ohio.

Other allergy & immunology in Findlay

See the full list for Ohio

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →