RxDoctor Payments Data

Zarina Sharalaya

Interventional Cardiology · Frisco, TXNPI 1871913566

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

The money is spread across several categories — speaking fees (44.0%), food and beverage and travel and lodging — rather than concentrated in one kind of arrangement. 30 manufacturers reported payments, led by Medtronic at 53.6% of the total. 2025 is the largest year on record at $15,701, more than ten times the $536 reported in 2019.

$27,394in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 210 payments — averaging $130.45 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Medtronic$15K
  • Inari Medical, Inc.$4K
  • Abiomed$2K
  • Boston Scientific$2K
  • Edwards Lifesciences$2K
  • ZOLL Services LLC (a/k/a ZOLL Lifecor Corp)$784
  • plus $3K from 24 others
$3,138in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 11 payments — averaging $285.27 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Eli Lilly$2K
  • Medtronic$1K

What the payments were for

  • Speaking & faculty fees$12,05044%
  • Grants$1,6416%
  • Travel & lodging$4,61317%
  • Food & beverage$9,09033%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$27,394 in reported general payments places this provider in the 80th percentile of 686 interventional cardiology providers in Texas.

See all interventional cardiology providers in Texas →

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$161,086
Medicare patients
532
Services billed
1,483

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
EliquisApixaban65$55,002
EntrestoSacubitril/Valsartan24$19,145
BrilintaTicagrelor11$6,605
Losartan Potassium99$1,143
Bumetanide22$1,036
ClopidogrelClopidogrel Bisulfate82$836
Atorvastatin Calcium84$675
Metoprolol Succinate39$623
Rosuvastatin Calcium63$536
Carvedilol68$512
Nifedipine ErNifedipine22$511
Spironolactone37$270
Potassium Chloride19$264
Metoprolol Tartrate36$249
Furosemide55$247

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
PfizerEliquis$97$55,00265 claims
NovartisEntresto$36$19,14524 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 80th percentile of 686 interventional cardiology providers in Texas.

Other interventional cardiology in Frisco

See the full list for Texas →

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →