RxDoctor Payments Data

Usman Qayyum, MD

Interventional Cardiology · Saint Louis, MONPI 1992728000

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by food and beverage: $14,015 of the $16,416 with a category attached, or 85.4%. It is spread thinly across 59 manufacturers, the largest accounting for just 16.2% — the pattern of someone who eats at a lot of different presentations. Reporting peaked in 2019 at $4,645 and has fallen 65.4% since, to $1,605 in 2025.

$16,416in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 548 payments — averaging $29.96 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Abbott$3K
  • Novartis$2K
  • Medtronic$2K
  • Penumbra, Inc.$875
  • Abiomed$871
  • AstraZeneca$718
  • plus $8K from 53 others
$704,799in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 27 payments — averaging $26,104 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Merck$666K
  • Bayer$21K
  • Organon$17K
  • Amgen$1K

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$2191%
  • Travel & lodging$2,13713%
  • Food & beverage$14,01585%
  • Education$450%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

CompanyPaymentsTotal
Abbott17$2,657
Novartis145$1,638
Medtronic(3 entities)16$1,517
Penumbra, Inc.11$875
Abiomed8$871
AstraZeneca28$718
Shockwave Medical, Inc5$648
Johnson & Johnson51$587
Merck25$479
Amgen24$469
E.r. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.24$442
Philips North America LLC4$439
Boehringer Ingelheim20$359
Boston Scientific6$348
Pfizer17$304
ZOLL Services LLC (a/k/a ZOLL Lifecor Corp)18$293
Edwards Lifesciences2$260
Sanofi-aventis U.S. LLC15$242
Bayer13$225
Jenavalve Technology, Inc.1$219
Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.7$193
Gilead11$190
Corcept Therapeutics7$176
UCB, Inc.2$150
Biotronik Inc.3$146
Vifor Pharma, Inc.9$145
Angiodynamics, Inc.1$144
Cardiovascular Systems Inc.1$126
Impulse Dynamics (USA) Inc.1$124
Biosense Webster, Inc.1$123
Novo Nordisk5$111
Kestra Medical Technology Services, Inc.5$107
Terumo Medical Corporation1$95
Cardiac Dimensions, Inc.1$90
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc.3$66
Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc.3$65
Amarin Pharma, Inc.4$65
Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals International, PLC3$63
KCI USA, Inc.1$60
Daiichi Sankyo Inc.3$57
Ironshore Pharmaceuticals Inc.3$57
AbbVie2$57
Reflow Medical Inc1$53
Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc.3$50
Livanova USA, Inc.1$35
Resmed Corp1$34
Lilly USA, LLC2$26
Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.2$26
Itamar Medical Inc1$25
United Imaging Healthcare North America LLC1$23
Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.1$22
Pharmacosmos Therapeutics Inc.1$20
Cvrx, Inc.1$18
Smith+Nephew1$17
Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.1$16
Amryt Pharma Holdings Ltd1$13
Tactile Systems Technology Inc1$13
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.1$12
Lundbeck LLC1$12

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$16,416 in reported general payments places this provider in the 65th percentile of 182 interventional cardiology providers in Missouri.

See all interventional cardiology providers in Missouri

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$308,397
Medicare patients
702
Services billed
4,829

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
EliquisApixaban335$371,170
XareltoRivaroxaban99$111,089
EntrestoSacubitril/Valsartan70$98,429
JardianceEmpagliflozin53$66,946
FarxigaDapagliflozin Propanediol37$48,484
Repatha SureclickEvolocumab42$42,280
MounjaroTirzepatide32$32,296
Praluent PenAlirocumab26$20,272
OzempicSemaglutide16$15,530
Rosuvastatin Calcium251$4,212
Chlorthalidone234$3,947
Dofetilide11$3,915
Atorvastatin Calcium291$3,215
Ranolazine ErRanolazine40$3,162
ClopidogrelClopidogrel Bisulfate268$2,677

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
PfizerEliquis$304$371,170335 claims
Johnson & JohnsonXarelto$587$111,08999 claims
NovartisEntresto$1,638$98,42970 claims
Boehringer IngelheimJardiance$359$66,94653 claims
AstraZenecaFarxiga$718$48,48437 claims
Lilly USA, LLCMounjaro$26$32,29632 claims
Novo NordiskOzempic$111$15,53016 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 65th percentile of 182 interventional cardiology providers in Missouri.

Other interventional cardiology in Saint Louis

See the full list for Missouri

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →