RxDoctor Payments Data

Tariq Ahmad, MD

Cardiovascular Disease · New Haven, CTNPI 1104955699

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by consulting fees: $64,281 of the $75,166 with a category attached, or 85.5%. 15 manufacturers reported payments, led by Novo Nordisk at 25.5% of the total. Reporting peaked in 2024 at $41,852 and has fallen 80.4% since, to $8,195 in 2025. Among cardiovascular disease clinicians in CT with any reported payments, this total sits in the top 5% — high for the specialty, which is a reason to read the composition above rather than the number alone.

$75,166in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 60 payments — averaging $1252.77 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Novo Nordisk$19K
  • Eli Lilly$12K
  • Amgen$12K
  • Edwards Lifesciences$10K
  • Sanofi-aventis U.S. LLC$4K
  • Vifor Pharma, Inc.$4K
  • plus $14K from 9 others
$241,614in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 6 payments — averaging $40,269 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • AstraZeneca$213K
  • E.r. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.$15K
  • Amgen$14K

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$64,28186%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$4,4746%
  • Travel & lodging$4,2186%
  • Food & beverage$2,1833%
  • Education$110%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$75,166 in reported general payments places this provider in the 95th percentile of 415 cardiovascular disease providers in Connecticut.

See all cardiovascular disease providers in Connecticut

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$29,836
Medicare patients
168
Services billed
341

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
EntrestoSacubitril/Valsartan24$28,423
JardianceEmpagliflozin20$22,764
Carvedilol17$253
Losartan Potassium14$161
Metoprolol Succinate17$142
Spironolactone17$114
Atorvastatin Calcium14$44

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
NovartisEntresto$2,038$28,42324 claims
Boehringer IngelheimJardiance$1,509$22,76420 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 95th percentile of 415 cardiovascular disease providers in Connecticut.

Other cardiovascular disease in New Haven

See the full list for Connecticut

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →