RxDoctor Payments Data

Tarik Hadid, MD

Hematology & Oncology · Warren, MINPI 1144424623

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by consulting fees: $6,013 of the $8,074 with a category attached, or 74.5%. 18 manufacturers reported payments, led by Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc. at 39.2% of the total. Reporting peaked in 2021 at $4,663 and has fallen 98.1% since, to $89 in 2025.

$8,074in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 31 payments — averaging $260.44 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc.$3K
  • Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.$3K
  • Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.$2K
  • AstraZeneca$131
  • Novartis$106
  • Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.$62
  • plus $262 from 12 others
$555,455in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 38 payments — averaging $14,617 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Merck$360K
  • Regeneron$139K
  • Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.$57K

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$6,01374%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$1,50019%
  • Food & beverage$4626%
  • Education$991%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$8,074 in reported general payments places this provider in the 80th percentile of 282 hematology & oncology providers in Michigan.

See all hematology & oncology providers in Michigan

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$50,849
Medicare patients
158
Services billed
433

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
TagrissoOsimertinib Mesylate13$220,092
EliquisApixaban21$15,140
Hydrocodone-AcetaminophenHydrocodone/Acetaminophen22$741
Dexamethasone14$525
Oxycodone Hcl11$471
Olanzapine OdtOlanzapine15$397
Amoxicillin-Clavulanate PotassAmoxicillin/Potassium Clav12$382
Ondansetron OdtOndansetron17$299
Prochlorperazine Maleate18$225
Pantoprazole Sodium13$169
Levothyroxine Sodium21$141
Prednisone14$65
Trazodone Hcl12$49

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
AstraZenecaTagrisso$131$220,09213 claims
PfizerEliquis$43$15,14021 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 80th percentile of 282 hematology & oncology providers in Michigan.

Other hematology & oncology in Warren

See the full list for Michigan

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →