RxDoctor Payments Data

Suzanne Chaves, MD

Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism · Rancho Mirage, CANPI 1851390058

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by travel and lodging: $352 of the $522 with a category attached, or 67.4%. Astrazeneca UK Limited accounts for 92.4% of it on its own, with 2 other manufacturers making up the rest. 2022 is the largest year on record at $482, more than ten times the $19 reported in 2019. That places this record below the midpoint for endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism clinicians in CA, where the typical reported total is $1,096.

$522in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 5 payments — averaging $104.32 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Astrazeneca UK Limited$482
  • AstraZeneca$21
  • Sanofi-aventis U.S. LLC$19
$581,126in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 12 payments — averaging $48,427 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Dexcom, Inc.$484K
  • Eli Lilly$61K
  • Astrazeneca UK Limited$37K

What the payments were for

  • Travel & lodging$35267%
  • Food & beverage$17033%

General payments by program year

19
20
22

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

How this compares

$522 in reported general payments places this provider in the 35th percentile of 952 endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism providers in California.

See all endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism providers in California

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$40,991
Medicare patients
248
Services billed
420

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
OzempicSemaglutide83$149,930
TrulicityDulaglutide45$99,536
TymlosAbaloparatide14$78,825
JardianceEmpagliflozin51$71,980
MounjaroTirzepatide47$54,483
FarxigaDapagliflozin Propanediol15$22,560
Synjardy XrEmpagliflozin/Metformin Hcl11$19,289
Xigduo XrDapaglifloz Propaned/Metformin14$17,535
Tresiba Flextouch U-200Insulin Degludec16$12,237
Tresiba Flextouch U-100Insulin Degludec11$8,202
Omnipod 5 Dexg7g6 Pods (Gen 5)Insulin Pump Cart,auto,bt,g6/711$6,414
Lantus SolostarInsulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog17$2,229
Metformin Hcl ErMetformin Hcl56$1,926
Nano 2nd Gen Pen NeedlePen Needle, Diabetic20$1,518
Risedronate Sodium18$1,307

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
AstraZenecaFarxiga$21$22,56015 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 35th percentile of 952 endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism providers in California.

Other endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism in Rancho Mirage

See the full list for California

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →