RxDoctor Payments Data

Sunita Radhakrishnan, MD

Ophthalmology · San Francisco, CANPI 1578513248

Payments from drug & device makers

$3,030in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 103 payments — averaging $29.42 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Alcon$931
  • AbbVie$683
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc.$286
  • Digital Diagnostics Inc.$250
  • Bausch & Lomb, A Division Of Bausch Health US, LLC$213
  • Sight Sciences, Inc.$176
  • plus $491 from 10 others

What the payments were for

  • Food & beverage$2,76299%
  • Education$181%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$3,030 in reported general payments places this provider in the 65th percentile of 2,513 ophthalmology providers in California.

See all ophthalmology providers in California

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$197,139
Medicare patients
351
Services billed
1,857

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
LumiganBimatoprost160$57,385
RocklatanNetarsudil Mesylat/Latanoprost70$30,318
RhopressaNetarsudil Mesylate35$20,393
TafluprostTafluprost/Pf83$14,215
Alphagan PBrimonidine Tartrate56$12,234
Dorzolamide-TimololDorzolamide/Timolol/Pf75$11,958
SimbrinzaBrinzolamide/Brimonidine Tart41$11,203
AzoptBrinzolamide22$9,528
Timolol MaleateTimolol Maleate/Pf26$9,299
CombiganBrimonidine Tartrate/Timolol18$9,233
Brimonidine Tartrate101$8,049
IyuzehLatanoprost/Pf19$7,288
Brinzolamide34$7,237
ZioptanTafluprost/Pf20$7,073
Travoprost39$6,310

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
AbbVieLumigan, Alphagan P, Combigan$683$78,852234 claims
Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Rocklatan, Rhopressa$103$50,711105 claims
AlconSimbrinza, Azopt$931$20,73063 claims
Thea Pharma Inc.Iyuzeh$161$7,28819 claims
Bausch & Lomb, A Division Of Bausch Health US, LLCProlensa$213$3,66011 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 65th percentile of 2,513 ophthalmology providers in California.

Other ophthalmology in San Francisco

See the full list for California

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →