RxDoctor Payments Data

Stuart Kassan, MD

Rheumatology · Denver, CONPI 1093706475

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

Almost everything reported here is food and beverage — 99.3% of the total across 165 separate payments, which is the pattern of a clinician who attends manufacturer presentations rather than one with a consulting arrangement. It is spread thinly across 18 manufacturers, the largest accounting for just 22.8% — the pattern of someone who eats at a lot of different presentations. Reporting peaked in 2022 at $1,033 and has fallen 97.2% since, to $29 in 2023.

$2,510in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 165 payments — averaging $15.21 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • GSK$573
  • AbbVie$448
  • Amgen$336
  • ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.$219
  • Novartis$215
  • Genentech USA, Inc.$196
  • plus $522 from 12 others
$72,511in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 25 payments — averaging $2900.44 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • AbbVie$34K
  • Servier Bioinnovation$14K
  • Novartis$12K
  • Janssen Research & Development, LLC$7K
  • E.r. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.$6K

What the payments were for

  • Food & beverage$2,49399%
  • Education$161%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

How this compares

$2,510 in reported general payments places this provider in the 60th percentile of 108 rheumatology providers in Colorado.

See all rheumatology providers in Colorado

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$61,671
Medicare patients
227
Services billed
428

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
Orencia ClickjectAbatacept12$77,256
BenlystaBelimumab12$59,948
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate317$14,014
Cevimeline Hcl42$9,735
Pilocarpine Hcl56$6,953
Celecoxib28$3,421
Prednisone186$2,372
Mycophenolate Mofetil23$2,363
Leflunomide23$1,658
MethotrexateMethotrexate Sodium76$1,388
Gabapentin43$1,292
Dapsone14$1,249
Minocycline Hcl24$1,237
Duloxetine Hcl24$747
Vitamin D2Ergocalciferol (Vitamin D2)40$694

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
GSKBenlysta$573$59,94812 claims
AbbVieSynthroid$448$48612 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 60th percentile of 108 rheumatology providers in Colorado.

Other rheumatology in Denver

See the full list for Colorado

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →