RxDoctor Payments Data

Schuman Tam, MD

Allergy/ Immunology · San Francisco, CANPI 1184674400

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

Almost everything reported here is food and beverage — 98.1% of the total across 932 separate payments, which is the pattern of a clinician who attends manufacturer presentations rather than one with a consulting arrangement. It is spread thinly across 42 manufacturers, the largest accounting for just 20.8% — the pattern of someone who eats at a lot of different presentations.

$22,663in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 932 payments — averaging $24.32 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • AstraZeneca$5K
  • GSK$4K
  • Sanofi$2K
  • Pfizer$1K
  • Boehringer Ingelheim$1K
  • Genentech USA, Inc.$1K
  • plus $8K from 36 others

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$670%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$1751%
  • Food & beverage$22,23898%
  • Education$1831%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

Too few allergy/ immunology providers in Californiato place this figure against a meaningful peer group, so we don't.

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$282,400
Medicare patients
500
Services billed
12,848

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
HizentraImmun Glob G(Igg)/Pro/Iga 0-5041$294,623
Dupixent SyringeDupilumab61$244,546
XolairOmalizumab48$99,984
Spiriva RespimatTiotropium Bromide85$75,467
Dupixent PenDupilumab17$64,355
Trelegy ElliptaFluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter75$62,350
Breo ElliptaFluticasone/Vilanterol119$60,960
TezspireTezepelumab-Ekko13$54,122
Qvar RedihalerBeclomethasone Dipropionate106$45,737
Atrovent HfaIpratropium Bromide50$34,208
SymbicortBudesonide/Formoterol Fumarate65$29,686
Arnuity ElliptaFluticasone Furoate84$25,646
Breztri AerosphereBudesonide/Glycopyr/Formoterol24$18,901
Advair HfaFluticasone Propion/Salmeterol29$18,122
DuleraMometasone/Formoterol35$15,695

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
CSL BehringHizentra$722$294,62341 claims
GSKTrelegy Ellipta, Breo Ellipta, Arnuity Ellipta$4,240$148,956278 claims
AstraZenecaTezspire, Symbicort, Breztri Aerosphere, Pulmicort Flexhaler$4,716$110,238130 claims
Boehringer IngelheimSpiriva Respimat$1,169$75,46785 claims
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Qvar Redihaler$374$45,737106 claims
Hikma Pharmaceuticals USAEpinephrine$38$7,60650 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. There are too few allergy/ immunology providers in Californiaon file to place this against a meaningful peer group, so we don't.

Other allergy/ immunology in San Francisco

See the full list for California

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →