RxDoctor Payments Data

Sarah Lonowski, MD

Dermatology · Omaha, NENPI 1013444223

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by consulting fees: $2,573 of the $3,187 with a category attached, or 80.7%. E.r. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. accounts for 88.2% of it on its own, with 5 other manufacturers making up the rest. Reporting peaked in 2024 at $2,934 and has fallen 95.0% since, to $146 in 2025.

$3,187in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 11 payments — averaging $289.71 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • E.r. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.$3K
  • AstraZeneca$133
  • AbbVie$107
  • Sanofi$86
  • Amgen$37
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc.$14
$85,390in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 5 payments — averaging $17,078 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Astrazeneca UK Limited$60K
  • Eli Lilly$25K

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$2,57381%
  • Food & beverage$60019%
  • Education$140%

General payments by program year

22
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$3,187 in reported general payments places this provider in the 65th percentile of 68 dermatology providers in Nebraska.

See all dermatology providers in Nebraska

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$62,899
Medicare patients
304
Services billed
1,156

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
Taltz AutoinjectorIxekizumab47$443,233
Humira(Cf) PenAdalimumab23$265,839
Skyrizi PenRisankizumab-Rzaa13$245,773
Dupixent PenDupilumab16$102,505
OtezlaApremilast16$74,680
Clobetasol Propionate47$4,909
Tacrolimus33$3,930
Clindamycin Phosphate47$1,630
ValacyclovirValacyclovir Hcl27$1,506
Dapsone13$1,092
Ketoconazole73$1,065
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate22$920
Doxycycline Monohydrate13$688
Triamcinolone Acetonide44$591
MethotrexateMethotrexate Sodium15$404

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
AmgenOtezla$37$74,68016 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 65th percentile of 68 dermatology providers in Nebraska.

Other dermatology in Omaha

See the full list for Nebraska

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →