RxDoctor Payments Data

Samantha Ngamsuntikul

Anatomic Pathology & Clinical Pathology · San Antonio, TXNPI 1487884649

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

Almost everything reported here is food and beverage — 100.0% of the total across 2 separate payments, which is the pattern of a clinician who attends manufacturer presentations rather than one with a consulting arrangement. That places this record below the midpoint for anatomic pathology & clinical pathology clinicians in TX, where the typical reported total is $104.

$57in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 2 payments — averaging $28.31 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Carter Bloodcare$33
  • Boston Scientific$24
$3,183,517in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 53 payments — averaging $60,066 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • BD$2.6M
  • Terumo BCT, Inc.$575K

What the payments were for

  • Food & beverage$57100%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

21
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

CompanyPaymentsTotal
Carter Bloodcare1$33
Boston Scientific1$24

How this compares

$57 in reported general payments places this provider in the 30th percentile of 736 anatomic pathology & clinical pathology providers in Texas.

See all anatomic pathology & clinical pathology providers in Texas

Other anatomic pathology & clinical pathology in San Antonio

See the full list for Texas

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →