RxDoctor Payments Data

Saif Anwaruddin, MD

Interventional Cardiology · Milwaukee, WINPI 1275658114

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

The money is spread across several categories — consulting fees (48.3%), speaking fees and food and beverage — rather than concentrated in one kind of arrangement. 21 manufacturers reported payments, led by Medtronic at 46.7% of the total. Reporting peaked in 2019 at $30,289 and has fallen 63.5% since, to $11,046 in 2025. Among interventional cardiology clinicians in WI with any reported payments, this total sits in the top 5% — high for the specialty, which is a reason to read the composition above rather than the number alone.

$79,987in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 233 payments — averaging $343.29 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Medtronic$37K
  • Edwards Lifesciences$31K
  • Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.$4K
  • Jenavalve Technology, Inc.$2K
  • Abbott$2K
  • Opsens Inc.$1K
  • plus $2K from 15 others
$102,594in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 19 payments — averaging $5399.68 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Edwards Lifesciences$64K
  • Medtronic$29K
  • Abbott$9K

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$38,65448%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$21,73527%
  • Travel & lodging$9,42212%
  • Food & beverage$10,16913%
  • Education$80%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$79,987 in reported general payments places this provider in the 95th percentile of 118 interventional cardiology providers in Wisconsin.

See all interventional cardiology providers in Wisconsin

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$49,380
Medicare patients
138
Services billed
263

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
EntrestoSacubitril/Valsartan14$25,062
Metoprolol Succinate12$182

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
NovartisEntresto$156$25,06214 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 95th percentile of 118 interventional cardiology providers in Wisconsin.

Other interventional cardiology in Milwaukee

See the full list for Wisconsin

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →