RxDoctor Payments Data

Rubina Qamar, MD

Hematology & Oncology · Milwaukee, WINPI 1366423774

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by education: $93 of the $128 with a category attached, or 72.6%. 5 manufacturers reported payments, led by E.r. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. at 46.7% of the total. Reporting peaked in 2022 at $43 and has fallen 53.7% since, to $20 in 2025. That places this record below the midpoint for hematology & oncology clinicians in WI, where the typical reported total is $411.

$128in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 7 payments — averaging $18.26 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • E.r. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.$60
  • Novartis$35
  • AVEO Pharmaceuticals, Inc.$20
  • Gilead$12
  • Pfizer$1
$499,955in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 36 payments — averaging $13,888 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Pfizer$379K
  • AstraZeneca$96K
  • Genentech, Inc.$13K
  • Janssen Research & Development, LLC$12K

What the payments were for

  • Food & beverage$3527%
  • Education$9373%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

How this compares

$128 in reported general payments places this provider in the 30th percentile of 248 hematology & oncology providers in Wisconsin.

See all hematology & oncology providers in Wisconsin

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$49,575
Medicare patients
255
Services billed
581

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
VerzenioAbemaciclib19$294,328
IbrancePalbociclib17$264,209
NubeqaDarolutamide17$235,812
InlytaAxitinib14$196,542
ErleadaApalutamide11$157,742
Abiraterone Acetate80$153,257
EliquisApixaban27$24,787
Anastrozole592$10,118
Exemestane44$5,184
Tamoxifen Citrate80$2,918
Letrozole52$1,306
Ondansetron Hcl28$1,234
Hydroxyurea17$530
Prednisone80$423
Dexamethasone29$308

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
PfizerIbrance, Inlyta, Eliquis$1$485,53858 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 30th percentile of 248 hematology & oncology providers in Wisconsin.

Other hematology & oncology in Milwaukee

See the full list for Wisconsin

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →