RxDoctor Payments Data

Rohit Varma, MD

Ophthalmology · Los Angeles, CANPI 1073670212

Payments from drug & device makers

$6,548in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 63 payments — averaging $103.94 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc.$5K
  • AbbVie$856
  • Alcon$422
  • Thea Pharma Inc.$114
  • Bausch & Lomb, A Division Of Bausch Health US, LLC$112
  • Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc.$86
  • plus $219 from 4 others
$1,942in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 1 payment — averaging $1942.00 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • F. Hoffmann-la Roche AG$2K

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$4,96776%
  • Food & beverage$1,58224%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$6,548 in reported general payments places this provider in the 75th percentile of 2,513 ophthalmology providers in California.

See all ophthalmology providers in California

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$346,527
Medicare patients
602
Services billed
2,801

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
SimbrinzaBrinzolamide/Brimonidine Tart947$241,246
RocklatanNetarsudil Mesylat/Latanoprost319$138,467
RhopressaNetarsudil Mesylate268$111,219
LumiganBimatoprost220$79,106
RestasisCyclosporine107$73,139
Alphagan PBrimonidine Tartrate151$62,367
Brimonidine Tartrate648$49,849
Brinzolamide306$46,157
CombiganBrimonidine Tartrate/Timolol114$38,991
VyzultaLatanoprostene Bunod87$29,246
Prednisolone Acetate553$27,708
Brimonidine Tartrate-TimololBrimonidine Tartrate/Timolol170$27,110
Cyclosporine79$25,682
Latanoprost2,333$18,773
AzoptBrinzolamide28$17,674

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
AbbVieLumigan, Restasis, Alphagan P, Combigan, Restasis Multidose$856$268,127615 claims
AlconSimbrinza, Azopt$422$258,920975 claims
Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Rocklatan, Rhopressa$4,739$249,687587 claims
Bausch & Lomb, A Division Of Bausch Health US, LLCLoteprednol Etabonate$112$3,80213 claims
Thea Pharma Inc.Iyuzeh$114$3,70214 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 75th percentile of 2,513 ophthalmology providers in California.

Other ophthalmology in Los Angeles

See the full list for California

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →