RxDoctor Payments Data

Rohit Kedia, DO

Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism · Mission Hills, CANPI 1033418249

Payments from drug & device makers

$102,347in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 171 payments — averaging $598.52 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • AbbVie$99K
  • Novo Nordisk$574
  • Chiesi USA, Inc.$325
  • Medtronic$224
  • Dexcom, Inc.$219
  • Radius Health, Inc.$217
  • plus $2K from 25 others

What the payments were for

  • Speaking & faculty fees$3259%
  • Food & beverage$3,05687%
  • Education$1254%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$102,347 in reported general payments places this provider in the 85th percentile of 952 endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism providers in California.

See all endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism providers in California

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$76,666
Medicare patients
156
Services billed
2,225

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
JardianceEmpagliflozin207$283,028
TrulicityDulaglutide108$167,203
OzempicSemaglutide98$144,674
TymlosAbaloparatide46$122,493
RybelsusSemaglutide60$112,176
Humalog Kwikpen U-200Insulin Lispro23$48,075
FarxigaDapagliflozin Propanediol53$44,005
JanuviaSitagliptin Phosphate36$41,615
ForteoTeriparatide11$41,419
Teriparatide11$40,618
MounjaroTirzepatide21$28,127
TradjentaLinagliptin22$25,139
Lantus SolostarInsulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog164$20,129
Toujeo Max SolostarInsulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog14$19,783
Humalog Kwikpen U-100Insulin Lispro62$18,737

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
Boehringer IngelheimJardiance, Tradjenta$120$308,167229 claims
Novo NordiskOzempic, Rybelsus$574$256,850158 claims
Lilly USA, LLCTrulicity, Forteo, Mounjaro, Humalog$87$241,718152 claims
Radius Health, Inc.Tymlos$217$122,49346 claims
AstraZenecaFarxiga$82$44,00553 claims
MerckJanuvia$130$41,61536 claims
AbbVieSynthroid$98,841$2,88345 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 85th percentile of 952 endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism providers in California.

Other endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism in Mission Hills

See the full list for California

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →