RxDoctor Payments Data

Robin Stan, MD

Cardiology · Inglewood, CANPI 1912903048

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

Almost everything reported here is food and beverage — 99.3% of the total across 468 separate payments, which is the pattern of a clinician who attends manufacturer presentations rather than one with a consulting arrangement. 34 manufacturers reported payments, led by Novartis at 25.3% of the total.

$8,681in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 468 payments — averaging $18.55 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Novartis$2K
  • Merck$665
  • Pfizer$642
  • Amgen$593
  • Boehringer Ingelheim$570
  • Novo Nordisk$550
  • plus $3K from 28 others
$39,436in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 2 payments — averaging $19,718 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Amgen$39K

What the payments were for

  • Food & beverage$8,62499%
  • Education$571%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

How this compares

$8,681 in reported general payments places this provider in the 85th percentile of 156 cardiology providers in California.

See all cardiology providers in California

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$728,581
Medicare patients
864
Services billed
17,360

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
EntrestoSacubitril/Valsartan192$237,443
EliquisApixaban123$162,215
XareltoRivaroxaban91$110,534
JardianceEmpagliflozin66$66,103
FarxigaDapagliflozin Propanediol46$62,883
VerquvoVericiguat22$25,935
OzempicSemaglutide26$21,800
Repatha SureclickEvolocumab17$15,683
Praluent PenAlirocumab16$9,500
Ranolazine ErRanolazine26$5,293
Atorvastatin Calcium493$3,610
Amlodipine Besylate389$2,692
Diltiazem 24hr Er (Cd)Diltiazem Hcl49$1,778
Losartan Potassium191$1,774
Carvedilol198$1,521

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
NovartisEntresto$2,194$237,443192 claims
PfizerEliquis$642$162,215123 claims
Johnson & JohnsonXarelto$419$110,53491 claims
Boehringer IngelheimJardiance$570$66,10366 claims
AstraZenecaFarxiga$502$62,88346 claims
MerckVerquvo$665$25,93522 claims
Novo NordiskOzempic$550$21,80026 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 85th percentile of 156 cardiology providers in California.

Other cardiology in Inglewood

See the full list for California

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →