RxDoctor Payments Data

Robert Gillespie, MD

Pediatric Nephrology · Fort Worth, TXNPI 1912043738

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

The money is spread across several categories — speaking fees (38.4%), consulting fees and travel and lodging — rather than concentrated in one kind of arrangement. 11 manufacturers reported payments, led by Amgen at 37.0% of the total. Reporting peaked in 2020 at $4,110 and has fallen 88.5% since, to $472 in 2025. Among pediatric nephrology clinicians in TX with any reported payments, this total sits in the top 10% — high for the specialty, which is a reason to read the composition above rather than the number alone.

$10,717in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 40 payments — averaging $267.92 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Amgen$4K
  • Mallinckrodt Enterprises LLC$3K
  • Travere Therapeutics, Inc.$2K
  • Sanofi$1K
  • AstraZeneca$352
  • Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.$130
  • plus $359 from 5 others
$44,555in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 22 payments — averaging $2025.23 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc.$33K
  • Sanofi US Services Inc.$11K

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$2,65025%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$4,11038%
  • Travel & lodging$2,05819%
  • Food & beverage$1,80917%
  • Education$901%

General payments by program year

19
20
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$10,717 in reported general payments places this provider in the 90th percentile of 61 pediatric nephrology providers in Texas.

See all pediatric nephrology providers in Texas

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$21,684
Medicare patients
22
Services billed
149

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
ProcysbiCysteamine Bitartrate12$691,637
CystadropsCysteamine Hcl13$119,816
Tacrolimus14$1,116
Mycophenolate Mofetil12$781
Prednisone23$246
Labetalol Hcl15$143
Cyproheptadine Hcl11$44
Amlodipine Besylate17$15

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
AmgenProcysbi$3,960$691,63712 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 90th percentile of 61 pediatric nephrology providers in Texas.

Other pediatric nephrology in Fort Worth

See the full list for Texas

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →