RxDoctor Payments Data

Rizwan Aslam, MD

Nephrology · Midwest City, OKNPI 1174885750

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

Almost everything reported here is food and beverage — 95.1% of the total across 80 separate payments, which is the pattern of a clinician who attends manufacturer presentations rather than one with a consulting arrangement. It is spread thinly across 21 manufacturers, the largest accounting for just 23.1% — the pattern of someone who eats at a lot of different presentations. That places this record below the midpoint for nephrology clinicians in OK, where the typical reported total is $2,111.

$2,008in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 80 payments — averaging $25.11 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • AstraZeneca$465
  • Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc.$346
  • Outset Medical Inc$145
  • GSK$137
  • Novo Nordisk$125
  • Vifor Pharma, Inc.$123
  • plus $667 from 15 others

What the payments were for

  • Food & beverage$1,91095%
  • Education$995%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$2,008 in reported general payments places this provider in the 45th percentile of 106 nephrology providers in Oklahoma.

See all nephrology providers in Oklahoma

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$324,056
Medicare patients
571
Services billed
4,261

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
FarxigaDapagliflozin Propanediol198$177,931
JardianceEmpagliflozin104$105,141
JanuviaSitagliptin Phosphate17$18,128
TradjentaLinagliptin16$11,181
Sevelamer Carbonate34$11,094
Calcium Acetate35$3,834
Midodrine Hcl22$1,988
Torsemide32$1,531
Potassium Chloride100$1,430
Potassium Citrate ErPotassium Citrate19$1,359
Lisinopril187$872
Amlodipine Besylate111$862
Allopurinol65$789
Metolazone21$729
Losartan Potassium64$590

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
AstraZenecaFarxiga$465$177,931198 claims
Boehringer IngelheimJardiance, Tradjenta$60$116,322120 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 45th percentile of 106 nephrology providers in Oklahoma.

Other nephrology in Midwest City

See the full list for Oklahoma

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →