RxDoctor Payments Data

Ralph Hester, MD

Ophthalmology · Oklahoma City, OKNPI 1215904974

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

Almost everything reported here is food and beverage — 100.0% of the total across 116 separate payments, which is the pattern of a clinician who attends manufacturer presentations rather than one with a consulting arrangement. It is spread thinly across 20 manufacturers, the largest accounting for just 13.3% — the pattern of someone who eats at a lot of different presentations. Reporting peaked in 2019 at $631 and has fallen 62.9% since, to $234 in 2025.

$1,939in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 116 payments — averaging $16.71 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc.$257
  • Sight Sciences, Inc.$193
  • Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc.$174
  • Harrow Eye, LLC$141
  • AbbVie$137
  • Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.$115
  • plus $921 from 14 others

What the payments were for

  • Food & beverage$1,939100%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

How this compares

$1,939 in reported general payments places this provider in the 65th percentile of 183 ophthalmology providers in Oklahoma.

See all ophthalmology providers in Oklahoma

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$394,546
Medicare patients
1,026
Services billed
2,655

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
RestasisCyclosporine24$33,479
LumiganBimatoprost48$22,401
FlarexFluorometholone Acetate113$14,157
CequaCyclosporine13$9,812
XiidraLifitegrast14$8,517
SimbrinzaBrinzolamide/Brimonidine Tart27$6,973
Ofloxacin368$4,535
Latanoprost407$4,387
Fluorometholone45$3,737
Neomycin-Polymyxin-DexamethNeomycin/Polymyxin B/Dexametha275$3,302
Brimonidine Tartrate29$1,195
Dorzolamide-TimololDorzolamide Hcl/Timolol Maleat19$310
ErythromycinErythromycin Base21$240
Timolol Maleate18$139
Sulfamethoxazole-TrimethoprimSulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim14$76

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
AbbVieRestasis, Lumigan$137$55,88072 claims
Eyevance Pharmaceuticals LLCFlarex$31$14,157113 claims
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc.Cequa$257$9,81213 claims
Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc.Xiidra$107$8,51714 claims
AlconSimbrinza$85$6,97327 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 65th percentile of 183 ophthalmology providers in Oklahoma.

Other ophthalmology in Oklahoma City

See the full list for Oklahoma

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →