RxDoctor Payments Data

Rajesh Pradhan, MD

Cardiovascular Disease · Rapid City, SDNPI 1912115841

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

15 manufacturers reported payments, led by Abbott at 58.5% of the total. 2025 is the largest year on record at $1,772, 3.7 times the $475 reported in 2019.

$3,020in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 48 payments — averaging $62.91 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Abbott$2K
  • Medtronic$360
  • Boehringer Ingelheim$193
  • ZOLL Services LLC (a/k/a ZOLL Lifecor Corp)$188
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc.$143
  • Pfizer$132
  • plus $237 from 9 others
$1,834,517in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 227 payments — averaging $8081.57 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • CSL Behring$440K
  • Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH$364K
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co.kg$347K
  • Eli Lilly$292K
  • Amgen$172K
  • Novartis$141K
  • plus $77K from 4 others

What the payments were for

  • Travel & lodging$1,45048%
  • Food & beverage$1,57052%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$3,020 in reported general payments places this provider in the 65th percentile of 33 cardiovascular disease providers in South Dakota.

See all cardiovascular disease providers in South Dakota

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$169,663
Medicare patients
2,510
Services billed
4,783

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
EliquisApixaban229$266,437
CamzyosMavacamten27$222,342
Repatha SureclickEvolocumab98$120,404
XareltoRivaroxaban77$90,060
Praluent PenAlirocumab40$51,198
EntrestoSacubitril/Valsartan42$39,853
JardianceEmpagliflozin38$22,388
FarxigaDapagliflozin Propanediol13$13,538
Repatha SyringeEvolocumab12$6,333
Metoprolol Succinate422$5,685
Atorvastatin Calcium499$4,957
Potassium Chloride116$2,914
Bumetanide55$2,143
Losartan Potassium220$1,885
Prasugrel Hcl15$1,781

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
PfizerEliquis$132$266,437229 claims
E.r. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.Camzyos$13$222,34227 claims
Johnson & JohnsonXarelto$14$90,06077 claims
NovartisEntresto$76$39,85342 claims
Boehringer IngelheimJardiance$193$22,38838 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 65th percentile of 33 cardiovascular disease providers in South Dakota.

Other cardiovascular disease in Rapid City

See the full list for South Dakota

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →