RxDoctor Payments Data

Rachel Lerner, MD

Hematology & Oncology · Saint Louis Park, MNNPI 1073549986

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by education: $38 of the $38 with a category attached, or 100.0%. Pfizer accounts for 68.6% of it on its own, with 1 other manufacturer making up the rest. That places this record below the midpoint for hematology & oncology clinicians in MN, where the typical reported total is $238.

$38in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 2 payments — averaging $18.96 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Pfizer$26
  • Gilead$12
$2,267,239in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 122 payments — averaging $18,584 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Novartis$1.7M
  • Genentech, Inc.$218K
  • Merck$135K
  • Pharmaand GmbH$105K
  • Acerta Pharma LLC$54K
  • Mirati Therapeutics, Inc.$18K
  • plus $15K from 3 others

What the payments were for

  • Education$38100%

General payments by program year

21
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

CompanyPaymentsTotal
Pfizer1$26
Gilead1$12

How this compares

$38 in reported general payments places this provider in the 15th percentile of 193 hematology & oncology providers in Minnesota.

See all hematology & oncology providers in Minnesota

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$1,411,752
Medicare patients
374
Services billed
60,378

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
IbrancePalbociclib27$421,816
VenclextaVenetoclax25$340,882
XtandiEnzalutamide20$274,096
ImbruvicaIbrutinib14$233,202
BosulifBosutinib11$225,122
DopteletAvatrombopag Maleate13$220,652
VerzenioAbemaciclib14$210,632
LynparzaOlaparib12$209,194
KisqaliRibociclib Succinate17$207,664
RevlimidLenalidomide11$202,702
CalquenceAcalabrutinib Maleate12$186,223
ErleadaApalutamide12$175,905
Lenalidomide13$162,565
CreonLipase/Protease/Amylase19$31,455
Abiraterone Acetate17$28,623

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
PfizerIbrance, Bosulif, Eliquis$26$669,93465 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 15th percentile of 193 hematology & oncology providers in Minnesota.

Other hematology & oncology in Saint Louis Park

See the full list for Minnesota

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →