RxDoctor Payments Data

Pramod Mistry, PhD

Gastroenterology · New Haven, CTNPI 1588648851

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by travel and lodging: $105,081 of the $126,355 with a category attached, or 83.2%. Sanofi accounts for 64.0% of it on its own, with 2 other manufacturers making up the rest. Reporting peaked in 2019 at $57,875 and has fallen 95.4% since, to $2,634 in 2025. Among gastroenterology clinicians in CT with any reported payments, this total sits in the top 5% — high for the specialty, which is a reason to read the composition above rather than the number alone.

$126,355in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 189 payments — averaging $668.55 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Sanofi$81K
  • Sanofi-aventis U.S. LLC$46K
  • Travere Therapeutics, Inc.$6
$5,911,372in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 170 payments — averaging $34,773 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Sanofi$5.4M
  • Sanofi US Services Inc.$448K
  • Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.$16K

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$2050%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$16,04213%
  • Travel & lodging$105,08183%
  • Food & beverage$5,0214%
  • Education$60%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

CompanyPaymentsTotal
Sanofi155$80,841
Sanofi-aventis U.S. LLC32$45,508
Travere Therapeutics, Inc.2$6

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$126,355 in reported general payments places this provider in the 95th percentile of 326 gastroenterology providers in Connecticut.

See all gastroenterology providers in Connecticut

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$13,117
Medicare patients
63
Services billed
121

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
CerdelgaEliglustat Tartrate166$4,803,321
VprivVelaglucerase Alfa46$1,600,653
CerezymeImiglucerase40$1,281,681
FabrazymeAgalsidase Beta42$1,153,330
Miglustat12$312,479
Trientine Hcl12$15,180

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
SanofiCerdelga, Cerezyme, Fabrazyme$80,841$7,238,332248 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 95th percentile of 326 gastroenterology providers in Connecticut.

Other gastroenterology in New Haven

See the full list for Connecticut

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →