RxDoctor Payments Data

Peter van Veldhuizen, MD

Hematology & Oncology · Wyoming, MINPI 1336163138

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by speaking fees: $1,154 of the $1,314 with a category attached, or 87.8%. Sanofi accounts for 87.8% of it on its own, with 5 other manufacturers making up the rest. Reporting peaked in 2019 at $1,194 and has fallen 94.8% since, to $62 in 2024. That places this record below the midpoint for hematology & oncology clinicians in MI, where the typical reported total is $1,604.

$1,314in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 6 payments — averaging $218.95 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Sanofi$1K
  • E.r. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.$62
  • Genentech, Inc.$57
  • Pfizer$15
  • Eisai Inc.$13
  • Exelixis Inc.$12
$705,583in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 122 payments — averaging $5783.47 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • AstraZeneca$203K
  • E.r. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.$183K
  • Roche Products Limited$126K
  • Clovis Oncology, Inc.$83K
  • Exelixis Inc.$46K
  • Genentech, Inc.$32K
  • plus $33K from 4 others

What the payments were for

  • Speaking & faculty fees$1,15488%
  • Food & beverage$13510%
  • Education$252%

General payments by program year

19
20
24

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$1,314 in reported general payments places this provider in the 45th percentile of 282 hematology & oncology providers in Michigan.

See all hematology & oncology providers in Michigan

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$23,120
Medicare patients
85
Services billed
201

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
CabometyxCabozantinib S-Malate37$935,571
Abiraterone Acetate52$232,131
OrgovyxRelugolix15$38,280
Prochlorperazine Maleate64$843
Bicalutamide26$523
Ondansetron Hcl68$359
Dexamethasone11$340
Oxycodone Hcl13$258
Prednisone44$227
Hydrocodone-AcetaminophenHydrocodone/Acetaminophen15$125
Olanzapine57$63
Gabapentin11$54

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
Exelixis Inc.Cabometyx$12$935,57137 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 45th percentile of 282 hematology & oncology providers in Michigan.

Other hematology & oncology in Wyoming

See the full list for Michigan

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →