RxDoctor Payments Data

Paul Tachau

Optometrist · Santa Fe, NMNPI 1649384710

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

Almost everything reported here is food and beverage — 100.0% of the total across 128 separate payments, which is the pattern of a clinician who attends manufacturer presentations rather than one with a consulting arrangement. It is spread thinly across 16 manufacturers, the largest accounting for just 23.9% — the pattern of someone who eats at a lot of different presentations. Reporting peaked in 2022 at $1,187 and has fallen 74.9% since, to $298 in 2025. Among optometrist clinicians in NM with any reported payments, this total sits in the top 10% — high for the specialty, which is a reason to read the composition above rather than the number alone.

$3,964in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 128 payments — averaging $30.97 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc.$947
  • AbbVie$844
  • Bausch & Lomb, A Division Of Bausch Health US, LLC$367
  • Dompe US, Inc.$335
  • Sight Sciences, Inc.$266
  • Alcon$254
  • plus $950 from 10 others

What the payments were for

  • Food & beverage$3,964100%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$3,964 in reported general payments places this provider in the 90th percentile of 228 optometrist providers in New Mexico.

See all optometrist providers in New Mexico

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$29,783
Medicare patients
187
Services billed
343

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
XiidraLifitegrast20$18,034
VyzultaLatanoprostene Bunod15$9,634
LumiganBimatoprost15$8,934
RestasisCyclosporine15$7,086
Latanoprost63$1,117
Dorzolamide Hcl55$1,023
Dorzolamide-TimololDorzolamide Hcl/Timolol Maleat16$403
Brimonidine Tartrate12$159

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc.Xiidra, Vyzulta$947$27,66835 claims
AbbVieLumigan, Restasis$844$16,02030 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 90th percentile of 228 optometrist providers in New Mexico.

Other optometrist in Santa Fe

See the full list for New Mexico

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →