RxDoctor Payments Data

Niki Tank, MD

Medical Oncology · Pasadena, CANPI 1629308515

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

The money is spread across several categories — consulting fees (50.5%), other and food and beverage — rather than concentrated in one kind of arrangement. 6 manufacturers reported payments, led by Pfizer at 50.5% of the total. 2023 is the largest year on record at $1,464, more than ten times the $47 reported in 2019. That places this record below the midpoint for medical oncology clinicians in CA, where the typical reported total is $4,042.

$2,474in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 19 payments — averaging $130.21 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Pfizer$1K
  • Novartis$1K
  • AstraZeneca$67
  • Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.$28
  • Incyte Corporation$18
  • Gilead$12
$763,260in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 9 payments — averaging $84,807 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Merck$412K
  • Pfizer$302K
  • Novartis$33K
  • Eli Lilly$17K

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$1,25051%
  • Food & beverage$1145%
  • Education$120%
  • Other$1,09844%

General payments by program year

19
21
22
23

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$2,474 in reported general payments places this provider in the 40th percentile of 379 medical oncology providers in California.

See all medical oncology providers in California →

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$266,327
Medicare patients
68
Services billed
20,757

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
IbrancePalbociclib18$265,436
Ondansetron OdtOndansetron13$767
Letrozole45$680
Exemestane11$562
Tamoxifen Citrate12$128
Famotidine18$127
Prochlorperazine Maleate13$89
Ondansetron Hcl11$57

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
PfizerIbrance$1,250$265,43618 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 40th percentile of 379 medical oncology providers in California.

Other medical oncology in Pasadena

See the full list for California →

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →