RxDoctor Payments Data

Nicholas Colatrella

Optometrist · Sartell, MNNPI 1467507475

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by speaking fees: $58,565 of the $84,400 with a category attached, or 69.4%. Katena Products, Inc. (dba Corza Medical) accounts for 66.4% of it on its own, with 16 other manufacturers making up the rest. Reporting peaked in 2019 at $23,411 and has fallen 95.3% since, to $1,100 in 2025. Among optometrist clinicians in MN with any reported payments, this total sits in the top 5% — high for the specialty, which is a reason to read the composition above rather than the number alone.

$84,400in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 83 payments — averaging $1016.86 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Katena Products, Inc. (dba Corza Medical)$56K
  • Dompe US, Inc.$15K
  • Surgical Specialties Corporation (US), Inc. (dba Corza Medical)$8K
  • AbbVie$3K
  • Biotissue Holdings Inc.$1K
  • Oyster Point Pharma, Inc.$720
  • plus $766 from 11 others

What the payments were for

  • Royalty or licence$3,7204%
  • Consulting fees$19,28223%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$58,56569%
  • Travel & lodging$1,0021%
  • Food & beverage$1,8312%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$84,400 in reported general payments places this provider in the 95th percentile of 826 optometrist providers in Minnesota.

See all optometrist providers in Minnesota

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$58,069
Medicare patients
126
Services billed
1,590

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
OxervateCenegermin-Bkbj13$627,187
RestasisCyclosporine69$60,949
Cyclosporine36$18,251
XiidraLifitegrast12$16,466
MieboPerfluorohexyloctane/Pf20$14,251
LumiganBimatoprost21$13,173
TyrvayaVarenicline Tartrate13$10,949
RhopressaNetarsudil Mesylate24$9,740
Prednisolone Acetate65$2,910
Timolol Maleate14$1,494
Dorzolamide-TimololDorzolamide Hcl/Timolol Maleat42$1,171
Latanoprost59$1,072
Ofloxacin17$378

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
Dompe US, Inc.Oxervate$14,762$627,18713 claims
AbbVieRestasis, Lumigan$2,815$74,12290 claims
Oyster Point Pharma, Inc.Tyrvaya$720$10,94913 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 95th percentile of 826 optometrist providers in Minnesota.

Other optometrist in Sartell

See the full list for Minnesota

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →