RxDoctor Payments Data

Neil Goldberg, MD

Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism · Culver City, CANPI 1780722181

Payments from drug & device makers

$202,653in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 407 payments — averaging $497.92 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Novo Nordisk$107K
  • AstraZeneca$79K
  • Bayer$8K
  • Johnson & Johnson$3K
  • Medtronic$2K
  • Lilly USA, LLC$731
  • plus $4K from 23 others

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$4,2782%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$161,61680%
  • Travel & lodging$22,64711%
  • Food & beverage$13,6677%
  • Education$4460%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$202,653 in reported general payments places this provider in the 90th percentile of 952 endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism providers in California.

See all endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism providers in California

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$162,444
Medicare patients
423
Services billed
1,298

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
OzempicSemaglutide462$683,424
MounjaroTirzepatide260$354,690
FarxigaDapagliflozin Propanediol259$288,446
JardianceEmpagliflozin126$176,950
RybelsusSemaglutide73$120,415
Xigduo XrDapaglifloz Propaned/Metformin96$87,464
JanuviaSitagliptin Phosphate60$64,235
Tresiba Flextouch U-200Insulin Degludec83$56,477
XyostedTestosterone Enanthate57$54,699
Fiasp FlextouchInsulin Aspart (Niacinamide)57$54,157
SynjardyEmpagliflozin/Metformin Hcl36$40,785
TymlosAbaloparatide14$40,739
InvokanaCanagliflozin26$39,949
EliquisApixaban31$34,259
VascepaIcosapent Ethyl38$28,818

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
Novo NordiskOzempic, Rybelsus, Fiasp$107,148$824,818556 claims
Lilly USA, LLCMounjaro, Trulicity, Humalog$731$384,266309 claims
AstraZenecaFarxiga$78,860$288,446259 claims
Boehringer IngelheimJardiance, Synjardy, Synjardy Xr$257$236,233173 claims
Johnson & JohnsonInvokana$2,592$39,94926 claims
AbbVieSynthroid, Linzess$55$29,220241 claims
BayerKerendia$7,665$26,73414 claims
Mannkind CorporationAfrezza$414$18,08626 claims
IBSA Pharma Inc.Tirosint$367$7,80132 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 90th percentile of 952 endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism providers in California.

Other endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism in Culver City

See the full list for California

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →