RxDoctor Payments Data

Michelle Sato, MD

Ophthalmology · Los Angeles, CANPI 1225326580

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

Almost everything reported here is food and beverage — 100.0% of the total across 159 separate payments, which is the pattern of a clinician who attends manufacturer presentations rather than one with a consulting arrangement. It is spread thinly across 27 manufacturers, the largest accounting for just 18.5% — the pattern of someone who eats at a lot of different presentations.

$4,508in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 159 payments — averaging $28.35 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Glaukos Corporation$833
  • Alcon$651
  • AbbVie$633
  • Nova Eye, Inc.$348
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc.$327
  • Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc.$317
  • plus $1K from 21 others
$74,572in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 64 payments — averaging $1165.19 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Glaukos Corporation$60K
  • AbbVie$14K

What the payments were for

  • Food & beverage$4,508100%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$4,508 in reported general payments places this provider in the 75th percentile of 2,513 ophthalmology providers in California.

See all ophthalmology providers in California →

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$444,746
Medicare patients
1,026
Services billed
4,673

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
VyzultaLatanoprostene Bunod139$74,163
Alphagan PBrimonidine Tartrate134$56,981
RestasisCyclosporine29$42,336
LumiganBimatoprost82$40,772
RhopressaNetarsudil Mesylate79$39,181
Brimonidine Tartrate393$26,695
RocklatanNetarsudil Mesylat/Latanoprost43$22,317
SimbrinzaBrinzolamide/Brimonidine Tart64$19,372
Latanoprost1,445$16,498
Brinzolamide70$12,320
Dorzolamide-TimololDorzolamide Hcl/Timolol Maleat622$12,092
Travoprost65$11,792
Cyclosporine15$10,397
XiidraLifitegrast11$10,041
Brimonidine Tartrate-TimololBrimonidine Tartrate/Timolol63$9,027

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
AbbVieAlphagan P, Restasis, Lumigan, Combigan$633$148,381271 claims
Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc.Vyzulta, Xiidra$327$84,204150 claims
Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Rhopressa, Rocklatan$317$61,499122 claims
AlconSimbrinza, Azopt$651$24,50281 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 75th percentile of 2,513 ophthalmology providers in California.

Other ophthalmology in Los Angeles

See the full list for California →

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →