RxDoctor Payments Data

Michelle Cholankeril, MD

Hematology & Oncology · Elizabeth, NJNPI 1801056155

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

Almost everything reported here is food and beverage — 98.2% of the total across 206 separate payments, which is the pattern of a clinician who attends manufacturer presentations rather than one with a consulting arrangement. 34 manufacturers reported payments, led by Exelixis Inc. at 24.5% of the total. Reporting peaked in 2023 at $2,331 and has fallen 80.5% since, to $455 in 2024.

$4,458in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 206 payments — averaging $21.64 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Exelixis Inc.$1K
  • Sanofi$312
  • Daiichi Sankyo Inc.$290
  • E.r. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.$282
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc.$215
  • Bayer$193
  • plus $2K from 28 others
$9,648in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 5 payments — averaging $1929.57 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Helsinn Healthcare SA$4K
  • Merck$3K
  • Regeneron$3K

What the payments were for

  • Food & beverage$4,37998%
  • Education$792%

Most of this is food and beverage — typically meals provided during product presentations at a clinic or hospital. Nationally that is the single largest category of reported payments by count.

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$4,458 in reported general payments places this provider in the 55th percentile of 362 hematology & oncology providers in New Jersey.

See all hematology & oncology providers in New Jersey →

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$18,847
Medicare patients
82
Services billed
150

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
Imatinib Mesylate11$68,761
EliquisApixaban11$7,621
Anastrozole80$1,065
Letrozole34$935
Gabapentin22$424
Tamoxifen Citrate17$346
Oxycodone Hcl14$287
Omeprazole14$160
Pantoprazole Sodium18$103
Alendronate Sodium23$102
Prednisone15$41

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
PfizerEliquis$74$7,62111 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 55th percentile of 362 hematology & oncology providers in New Jersey.

Other hematology & oncology in Elizabeth

See the full list for New Jersey →

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →