RxDoctor Payments Data

Michael Saidel, MD

Cornea and External Diseases Specialist · Sonoma, CANPI 1184780330

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

The money is spread across several categories — speaking fees (47.1%), consulting fees and other — rather than concentrated in one kind of arrangement. 28 manufacturers reported payments, led by Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. at 36.5% of the total. Reporting peaked in 2019 at $26,378 and has fallen 96.2% since, to $1,007 in 2025.

$51,411in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 244 payments — averaging $210.70 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc.$19K
  • Glaukos Corporation$8K
  • Eyepoint US, Inc.$8K
  • Bausch & Lomb, A Division Of Bausch Health US, LLC$7K
  • Integra Lifesciences Corporation$4K
  • Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc.$1K
  • plus $4K from 22 others
$69,393in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 75 payments — averaging $925.24 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • Glaukos Corporation$69K

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$9,00018%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$24,20047%
  • Travel & lodging$4,2758%
  • Food & beverage$6,28712%
  • Education$980%
  • Gifts$750%
  • Other$7,47515%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$51,411 in reported general payments places this provider in the 85th percentile of 50 cornea and external diseases specialist providers in California.

See all cornea and external diseases specialist providers in California

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$573,570
Medicare patients
1,360
Services billed
3,710

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
RestasisCyclosporine70$54,924
XiidraLifitegrast42$49,962
CequaCyclosporine25$26,603
LumiganBimatoprost20$12,921
Cyclosporine25$10,431
Travoprost31$7,880
Loteprednol Etabonate50$7,163
Latanoprost308$5,984
RhopressaNetarsudil Mesylate13$5,610
Prednisolone Acetate106$4,956
Fluorometholone37$2,823
Timolol Maleate90$2,277
Tobramycin-DexamethasoneTobramycin/Dexamethasone43$2,005
MoxifloxacinMoxifloxacin Hcl67$1,494
Brimonidine Tartrate18$1,412

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
AbbVieRestasis, Lumigan$478$67,84590 claims
Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc.Xiidra$302$49,96242 claims
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc.Cequa$18,777$26,60325 claims
Bausch & Lomb, A Division Of Bausch Health US, LLCLoteprednol Etabonate$7,089$7,16350 claims
Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Rhopressa$201$5,61013 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 85th percentile of 50 cornea and external diseases specialist providers in California.

Other cornea and external diseases specialist in Sonoma

See the full list for California

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →