RxDoctor Payments Data

Matthew McMenemy, MD

Ophthalmology · Sugar Land, TXNPI 1700842267

Payments from drug & device makers

$164,461in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 663 payments — averaging $248.06 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc.$77K
  • Bausch & Lomb, A Division Of Bausch Health US, LLC$32K
  • Novartis$18K
  • Novo Nordisk AS$14K
  • Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc.$5K
  • Regeneron$2K
  • plus $16K from 30 others

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$10,8257%
  • Speaking & faculty fees$111,23574%
  • Travel & lodging$9,4056%
  • Food & beverage$17,82612%
  • Other$7701%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$164,461 in reported general payments places this provider in the 90th percentile of 1,355 ophthalmology providers in Texas.

See all ophthalmology providers in Texas

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$919,381
Medicare patients
1,836
Services billed
11,506

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
XiidraLifitegrast54$81,028
VyzultaLatanoprostene Bunod148$73,047
LumiganBimatoprost132$68,767
RestasisCyclosporine55$63,954
XdemvyLotilaner27$50,518
Lotemax SmLoteprednol Etabonate170$41,807
ProlensaBromfenac Sodium116$39,668
Latanoprost2,676$37,420
BesivanceBesifloxacin Hcl166$36,253
RocklatanNetarsudil Mesylat/Latanoprost44$36,047
CombiganBrimonidine Tartrate/Timolol78$35,088
RhopressaNetarsudil Mesylate55$33,885
Travoprost161$30,965
SimbrinzaBrinzolamide/Brimonidine Tart66$25,707
Brimonidine Tartrate-TimololBrimonidine Tartrate/Timolol88$22,352

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
AbbVieLumigan, Restasis, Combigan$2,273$167,808265 claims
Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc.Xiidra, Vyzulta$77,196$154,075202 claims
Bausch & Lomb, A Division Of Bausch Health US, LLCLotemax Sm, Prolensa, Besivance, Loteprednol Etabonate$32,110$125,006515 claims
Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Rocklatan, Rhopressa$1,178$69,93299 claims
Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Xdemvy$523$50,51827 claims
AlconSimbrinza$2,396$25,70766 claims
Harrow Eye, LLCVevye$550$20,27719 claims
NovartisTravatan Z$17,825$9,09611 claims
Oyster Point Pharma, Inc.Tyrvaya$385$9,09115 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 90th percentile of 1,355 ophthalmology providers in Texas.

Other ophthalmology in Sugar Land

See the full list for Texas

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →