RxDoctor Payments Data

Margaret Yu, MD

Nephrology · Stanford, CANPI 1811173735

Payments from drug & device makers

What this record shows

This record is dominated by consulting fees: $810 of the $1,272 with a category attached, or 63.7%. Bayer accounts for 63.7% of it on its own, with 4 other manufacturers making up the rest. Reporting peaked in 2020 at $849 and has fallen 97.7% since, to $20 in 2024. That places this record below the midpoint for nephrology clinicians in CA, where the typical reported total is $1,018.

$1,272in general payments, 2019–2025

Across 14 payments — averaging $90.85 each. Meals, travel, consulting and speaking fees, gifts and royalties reported by drug and device makers.

  • Bayer$810
  • Novartis$192
  • Ablative Solutions, Inc.$125
  • Gilead$125
  • ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.$20
$117,795in research payments, 2019–2025

Across 14 payments — averaging $8413.92 each. Payments tied to a research study. These frequently flow through the physician to a hospital or research institution rather than to the physician personally.

  • AstraZeneca$113K
  • Gilead$5K

What the payments were for

  • Consulting fees$81064%
  • Food & beverage$46236%

General payments by program year

19
20
21
24

Who reported the general payments

Companies are grouped under their corporate parent — a single manufacturer often files under several CMS reporting entities. Research and ownership payments are counted separately and are not in this table.

CompanyPaymentsTotal
Bayer1$810
Novartis9$192
Ablative Solutions, Inc.1$125
Gilead2$125
ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.1$20

What the payments were tied to

Products named in the reported payments. Only payments of $100 or more are attributed here — the typical reported payment nationally is a meal worth about $16, and listing those product-by-product would be noise.

How this compares

$1,272 in reported general payments places this provider in the 50th percentile of 1,341 nephrology providers in California.

See all nephrology providers in California →

Medicare billing

Part B allowed, 2024
$186,145
Medicare patients
287
Services billed
1,071

What this is not: this is the amount Original Medicare Part B allowed for services this provider billed in 2024. It is not their income. It excludes Medicare Advantage — now more than half of all Medicare enrollment — along with Medicaid and all commercial insurance, and it is gross practice revenue before staff, rent, supplies and malpractice premiums. CMS also suppresses any figure covering ten or fewer patients, so low-volume providers appear smaller than they are.

Most prescribed under Part D

DrugClaimsCost to plans & patients
JardianceEmpagliflozin48$51,219
KerendiaFinerenone16$14,162
Sevelamer Carbonate41$9,051
RetacritEpoetin Alfa-Epbx18$5,804
Calcium Acetate21$2,711
Losartan Potassium94$1,140
Torsemide43$852
Chlorthalidone54$538
Amlodipine Besylate96$509
Calcitriol19$395
Tamsulosin Hcl18$380
Carvedilol39$380
Allopurinol40$291
Mycophenolate Mofetil12$287
Lisinopril39$281

Paid to pharmacies, not to this prescriber.

Companies that both paid and supply prescribed drugs

These companies both reported payments to this provider and make drugs the provider prescribed under Medicare Part D in 2024. For most specialties this overlap is expected — a cardiologist who is paid by a cardiology drugmaker also treats heart disease. It is shown so the reader can see it, not because it implies anything on its own.

CompanyPaid to this providerPart D cost of their drugs
BayerKerendia$810$14,16216 claims

Reading this fairly. The Part D column is what drug plans and patients paid pharmacies — this provider received none of it, and it reflects how many patients they treat and what those drugs cost. Against peers, this provider's reported payments sit in the 50th percentile of 1,341 nephrology providers in California.

Other nephrology in Stanford

See the full list for California →

Where these figures come from

Is this you, or does something look wrong? →